InfoTrac Web: Health
Reference Center-Academic.
Source: Women's
Health Weekly, Jan 31, 2002 p16.
Title: New Study Warns Pregnant Women Millions Drink
Contaminated Water.
Subjects: Drinking water - Contamination
Pregnant women - Health aspects
Locations: United States
Electronic Collection: A82125311
RN: A82125311
Full Text COPYRIGHT 2002 NewsRX
2002 JAN 31 - (NewsRx.com & NewsRx.net) --
Millions of Americans have been drinking tap water
contaminated with chemical chlorine byproducts that are far
more than what studies suggest may be safe for pregnant
women, two environmental groups say in a new study.
Chlorine is commonly used to disinfect
drinking water. When it is added to
water that contains organic matter such as runoff from farms
or lawns,
however, it can form compounds such as chloroform that can
cause illness.
The study released January 8, 2002, by the
Environmental Working Group and Public Interest Research
Groups identified areas that may have increased
health risks including miscarriage, neural tube defects and
reduced fetal
growth from women drinking chlorination byproducts.
"By failing to clean up rivers and
reservoirs that provide drinking water for
hundreds of millions of Americans, EPA and the Congress have
forced water
utilities to chlorinate water that is contaminated with
animal waste, sewage,
fertilizer, algae and sediment," the report says.
Jane Houlihan, EWG's research director,
said the report also shows how that
cleanup failure has "a direct impact on human health."
Pregnant women need to drink plenty of water, she said, but
they can reduce their exposure to
potential risks through simple measures such as home filters
and purchasing
bottled water.
One expert on environmental health
cautioned that the link between the
byproducts and pregnancy risks is suggestive, not
conclusive.
Still, if the pregnancy studies are
proved, millions could be at risk, said
Dr. Robert Morris, an environmental epidemiologist at Tufts
University School
of Medicine in Boston, Massachusetts.
"That body of literature isn't necessarily
conclusive but people ought to be
aware of it," Morris said. "It's pretty clear that some of
these compounds can
be pretty bad actors. The fact that these levels are as high
as they are is
certainly something to be concerned about."
The environmental groups combed water
quality records in 29 states and the
District of Columbia and matched them with various research
into birth defects and miscarriages conducted by state and
federal agencies and universities.
The groups said the places statistically
most at risk due to chlorination
byproducts were those that are populous, lacked buffers from
urban sprawl and were downstream from agricultural sites.
But women in small towns generally face twice the risk from
drinking high levels of the byproducts, Houlihan said.
Matching high rates doesn't prove the
environmental risk caused the health
problems, however. Also, the results are limited because,
among other reasons, such health records do not exist in
some states.
The Environmental Protection Agency
already has decided that some chlorination byproducts pose
health risks and instituted stricter standards on January 1,
2002, for seven of them: five haloacetic acids, bromate and
chlorite. The agency also began requiring a reduction by
one-fifth of the allowable level for trihalomethanes,
another chemical produced by adding chlorine to dirty water.
EPA studies showed that reducing the level
of trihalomethanes might mean 2332 fewer cases of bladder
cancer per year, down from its estimate of up to 9300 annual
cases caused by trihalomethanes.
While the environmental groups said the
majority of water suppliers were
meeting the current and future drinking water health
standards, they also
found that since 1995 more than 11 million people in 1044
communities were being served water contaminated with
chlorination byproducts for 12 months in a row at levels
above the new legal limit.
To reduce the risks, the groups said, the
federal government should provide
billions of dollars more for cleaning up sources of
contaminated water and
providing more buffer areas that can filter potential
contaminants from
farmland and urban areas.
This article was prepared by Women's
Health Weekly editors from staff and
other reports. |